Attitudes Toward Psychedelic-Assisted Therapy: Insights from U.S. Psychologists

Psychedelic-assisted therapy (PAT) is gaining momentum as a promising approach for treating various mental health conditions, from depression to substance use disorders. However, as the field of psychedelic research expands, it is crucial to understand the perspectives of those who may be at the forefront of implementing these treatments: clinical psychologists. A recent study led by Alan K. Davis, PhD, and including contributions from Brian Pilecki, PhD, and Jason Luoma, PhD, from Portland Psychotherapy, provides valuable insights into the attitudes and beliefs of U.S. psychologists regarding the therapeutic use of psychedelics. 

Surveying the Landscape: Psychologists’ Perspectives 

The study surveyed 366 clinical psychologists across the United States to gauge their views on psychedelic-assisted therapy (PAT), focusing specifically on psilocybin—a substance that has shown promise in treating conditions like major depressive disorder, PTSD, and anxiety. The survey explored several key areas: the acceptability of PAT, perceptions of its risks and benefits, and comparisons between PAT and more traditional therapeutic interventions. 

Cautious Optimism with Reservations 

The findings reveal a cautiously optimistic stance among psychologists regarding the potential of psychedelics in therapy. A significant portion of the respondents expressed favorable attitudes toward the therapeutic potential of psychedelics, with many acknowledging the need for further research. About 84% of participants agreed that psychedelic-assisted interventions deserve more scientific exploration, reflecting a broad recognition of their promise in mental health treatment. 

However, this optimism is tempered by concerns about the safety and risks associated with psychedelic use. The survey revealed that nearly half of the psychologists surveyed believed that the use of psychedelics could increase the risk of psychiatric disorders, with 47.9% expressing concerns about potential psychiatric risks and 34.6% about potential neurocognitive impairments. These concerns likely stem from the historical stigma surrounding psychedelics, coupled with the relatively limited clinical experience most psychologists have with these substances. 

Comparing Psilocybin to Traditional Therapeutic Practices 

One of the most intriguing aspects of the study was its comparison of psychologists’ responses to psilocybin experiences versus more traditional spiritual or meditative experiences. When presented with vignettes of clients who had undergone either a psilocybin experience or a spiritual retreat, psychologists were much more likely to express concerns with the psilocybin vignette even though all other details were the same. For instance, 76.2% of participants indicated that they would warn clients about the risks of engaging in psilocybin use, compared to only 23.8% who would do the same for a spiritual retreat, despite evidence that attending mindfulness-based retreats does incur some degree of psychological risk. This discrepancy highlights the lingering stigma and perceived dangers associated with psychedelics, even in a controlled, therapeutic context. 

Moreover, when asked about the acceptability of PAT compared to medication-assisted treatments (MAT) for substance use disorders, psychologists were more supportive of the latter. Only 22.2% found PAT to be an acceptable approach, compared to 76.3% who endorsed MAT. This significant difference underscores the need for more education and training on the safety and efficacy of psychedelics in clinical settings. 

The Need for Education and Training 

The study also pointed out a critical gap in knowledge among psychologists regarding psychedelics. While a substantial number of participants were open to the idea of psychedelic therapy, most admitted to lacking a clear understanding of its effects. Only 19.5% of respondents felt they had a very clear understanding of psychedelic-assisted therapy, indicating a strong need for further education and consultation in this emerging field. 

Interestingly, despite these knowledge gaps, the study found that a sizable proportion of psychologists had encountered patients who discussed psychedelic experiences during therapy. This suggests that, as psychedelics continue to gain cultural and clinical relevance, psychologists will increasingly need to engage with these topics in their practice.  

Moving Forward: Integrating Psychedelics into Mental Health Care 

The results of this study highlight the potential and challenges of integrating psychedelic-assisted therapy into mainstream mental health care. While there is significant interest and cautious optimism among psychologists, concerns about safety and a lack of comprehensive understanding present barriers to wider acceptance. 

While psychedelic-assisted therapy holds great promise, its successful integration into clinical practice will require ongoing research, education, and open-mindedness from the psychological community. By addressing the concerns and knowledge gaps highlighted in this study, the field can move closer to realizing the full therapeutic potential of psychedelics, ultimately offering new hope to those suffering from intractable mental health conditions. 

You can find an open access version of this article here. 

Previous
Previous

New Study Compares Attitudes Toward Psychedelic Therapy Across Mental Health Disciplines 

Next
Next

The Importance of Touch in MDMA-Assisted Therapy: Insights from Recent Research